The Peel Web
I am happy that you are using this web site and hope that you found it useful. Unfortunately, the cost of making this material freely available is increasing, so if you have found the site useful and would like to contribute towards its continuation, I would greatly appreciate it. Click the button to go to Paypal and make a donation.
This was the work of Edwin Chadwick alone: he conducted his investigation between 1839 and 1841. His work formed the basis of the 1848 Public Health Act. Chadwick put in a massive personal effort. Engels used Chadwick's work for his Condition of the Working Class in England (1844).
The Report was an objective work, which followed the 1840 Report of the Health of Towns Committee. The 1842 Report was sponsored by the Poor Law Commission. It sold over 30,000 copies, but did not have the authority of an official document, as it was published in Chadwick's name. It presented four main themes, with a mass of examples offered as proofs. The cholera scares of 1831 and 1839 helped him, and the 1848 Act coincided with another outbreak of cholera.
The Report pointed out the correlation between the lack of sanitation and
This was done without medical knowledge. This theme comprised half the Report. It highlighted overcrowding, where disease and dirt were greatest. It is clear from the Report that population growth was outstripping housing development, leading to overcrowding.
|1837-41||population growth||housing growth rate|
|In 1840||15,000 persons in Manchester lived in cellars|
|39,000 persons in Liverpool lived in 7,800 cellars|
|86,000 persons in Liverpool lived in 2,400 courts|
The Report on the Health of Towns (1840) noted
|The backs of the houses in one court are built against the backs of the houses in the next court; at the further end there is generally an ash-pit between two privies; they are in the most abominable state of filth ... The stench arising from these causes ... render it almost impossible to remain for any time|
The economic costs of ill-health were given less emphasis. This reveals Chadwick's shift in attitude: he was becoming more humanitarian, but the social costs of squalor were heavily stressed. As Flinn says, 'Chadwick's unequivocal statement of the interaction of bad and inadequate housing with intemperance, immorality, bad spending, as well as disease, represents a major breakthrough in social thinking'. The inefficiencies of the existing system of administration were clearly demonstrated. Flinn says, 'Epidemics were brief, memories short and municipal purses tight. Chadwick's Report was much in advance of its time.
Peel's Government first received Chadwick's Report and wanted to verify it, so it set up the Buccleuch Commission in 1843, to investigate the health of towns and to subject Chadwick's Report to a general inquiry with a view towards special legislation. It endorsed Chadwick's work in the 1844 Report of the Commissioners Inquiring into the State of the Large Towns and Populous Districts. In 1843 a Burials Report was ordered from Chadwick by Sir James Graham. It led to a valuable sequel to the Sanitary Report.
N.B. Health problems and the question of public health suffered much the same fate as the factory issue. It was subordinated to the more pressing issue of economics.
Russell's (Whig) Government of 1846-52 followed earlier institutional reform programmes but attempted tentative social reform by passing the first public health legislation.
|Meet the web creator||
These materials may be freely used for
non-commercial purposes in accordance with applicable statutory allowances
and distribution to students.
Last modified 4 March, 2016
|American Affairs 1760-83||The Age of the French Wars 1792-1815||Irish Affairs 1760-89|
|Economic Affairs in the Age of Peel||Irish
|Primary sources index||British Political Personalities||British Foreign policy 1815-65||European history||