The Peel Web
I am happy that you are using
this web site and hope that you found it useful. Unfortunately, the cost of
making this material freely available is increasing, so if you have
found the site useful and would like to contribute towards its continuation,
I would greatly appreciate it. Click the button to go to Paypal and make a
- Industrial and agricultural workers disliked the new conditions of 19th-century
factory discipline, low wages, periodic unemployment
and high prices. There was much resentment at the widening gulf between rich
and poor. There was discontent because of exploitation
in factories. Traditional hand-workers, such as the London silk-weavers and
workers in the Yorkshire woollen industry and the lace-making industries of
Nottinghamshire and Leicestershire, were facing extreme distress in the face
of competition from machines. There were few alternatives: they could join
the factory workers or ask for relief from the parish.
After 1837 they could go in the workhouse. Grievances
existed in mutually hostile groups from declining and rising industries. Some
craftsmen tended towards Luddism as
a solution to their problems.
- The 1815 Corn Laws and a protectionist economy still prevailed despite Huskisson's reforms of the 1820s. The Corn Laws kept food prices artificially high and therefore depressed domestic markets for manufactures - thus depressing employment. Foreign markets were also undercut, further reducing factory output and exports. Reforms were also needed in banking, customs and taxation. The 1830s also saw a series of bad harvests.
- Taxation fell mainly on the working classes in indirect taxation. At least
16% of real wages were consumed by taxes. The abolition of income tax in
1816 worsened the situation. The real value of wages was diminished and
bad harvests made things worse.
- There were a series of fiscal crises in the 1830s. The Whigs were in power from 1830 to 1841: they were weak in economic strategy and left a £7 million deficit on leaving office. They made no attempt to reform banking or the currency.
Between 1836-38 about 63 banks crashed in England. Little money was available
for investment, which led to unemployment at a time of high food prices. Much
bullion had been invested in America where good returns could be made. Federal
governments borrowed and Britain invested, then in 1837 President Jackson refused
to re-charter the Bank of the United States, and caused a financial panic in
America. Also the 1838 harvest was poor so bullion was exported to buy food.
Industry suffered; there was massive unemployment and higher food prices. By
the later 1830s, the home demand for the products of industry, together 'with
the available export market, was insufficient to consume the whole of the potential...
The contrast between the economic potential and the condition of the people
was at its sharpest'. (Checkland)
Contemporary writers pointed out the disparity in the distribution of wealth
in this period. Disraeli, later leader of the Tories,
drew in his novel Sybil or The Two Nations a picture of England
sharply divided into the haves and the have-nots (1845); Dickens exposed conditions
in his books, such as Hard Times (1854) and Oliver Twist (1837);
Thomas Arnold, headmaster of Rugby School echoed these sentiments and saw the
grave possibility of class revolution; Friedrich Engels wrote Condition of
the English Working Classes in 1844, acquiring his raw material from evidence
in Manchester. Karl Marx used Engels' work as a basis
for his own Das Kapital.
The Anti-Corn-Law League was affected by the same economic conditions but sought to solve the problem with economic ideas: i.e. repeal of the Corn Laws and the introduction of free trade. The Chartists sought to solve their economic problems with political reform.
- The working classes had given massive support to the middle-class campaign
for the 1832 Reform Act because they had been
drawn by the possibility of the franchise, or legislation to help them. The
working class was dissatisfied because the 1832 Act did not enfranchise them,
and also they were unhappy with the 'finality' attitude of the Whigs and Tory
hostility to reform, all of which offered no prospect of the future achievement
of the vote for the working classes.
- Subsequent Whig reforms came as a bitter disappointment and actually hurt the working man. Middle-class representation led to middle-class legislation, so Chartists sought a political solution to their economic and social problems. Whig reforms were institutional rather than social or economic:
- the 1833 Factory Act regulated child labour
but not adult hours, and applied only to textile factories. It was
a bitter disappointment to the 10-hour movement.
- the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act treated
poverty as a crime and aimed at cutting poor rates. Workhouses were hated
- they were known as "poor law bastilles" - because of the brutal conditions.
The Anti-Poor-Law campaign of 1834-36
failed. Some members of the movement planned to demolish the workhouses
that were being erected. Sir Charles Napier,
who was sympathetic towards the poor and highly critical of the Poor Law
Amendment Act, described conditions in Nottingham
- Early trades unions failed. Legislation in 1824 and
1825 repealed the Combination Acts
of 1799 and 1800 and unions were again allowed, subject to many restrictions.
Many unions had been established after 1825 but failed to bargain effectively
- 1829: moves were made to establish national T.U.s covering whole industries, e.g. John Doherty's Spinners' Union and an attempted Builders' Union. They failed because they were too big and contained mutually hostile members.
- 1833: Robert Owen, a philanthropic early 'socialist',
founded the Grand National Consolidated Trade Union which aimed to unite
all workers in one vast union. By 1834 the GNCTU
had 1 million members. It failed.
- Schemes were easily defeated by employers who countered strikes with lock-outs. It was an employers' market anyway. In 1834 employers began to issue 'The Document' for mutual assistance against strikers and trade unionists. They aimed at rooting out T.U.s in their workshops, but caused continuing bitterness and conflict in industrial relations. The government supported the employers. Perhaps the best example of this was the case of the Tolpuddle Martyrs in 1834. Chartism may have seemed a better alternative to transportation to Australia.
- Economic slumps meant that workers could not afford the strike weapon: high
prices and the dread of workhouses; fear of
transportation. Unions had small and inadequate funds for strikes; the
rising population and restricted employment created an employers' market.
as born of failed movements:
1830-1832 Reform campaign
New Model T.U.s
Although Chartism failed in the short term, it was a significant movement in the development of working class organisation.
Chartism tore itself apart:
- philosophical radicals; craftsmen; skilled artisans
Leaders: constitutional reformers, moderates, like Lovett
- domestic woollen workers
Leaders: physical force men, especially Feargus O'Connor
- cotton workers
Leaders: violent neo-Marxist revolutionaries. Some were embryonic
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
- Luddite types.
The led wanted social and economic reform. There was little
|Meet the web creator
These materials may be freely used for
non-commercial purposes in accordance with applicable statutory allowances
and distribution to students.
Re-publication in any
form is subject to written permission.
4 March, 2016